hi all,
I was to write a paper on atheism and I got enough data from the above argument.
As far as my views are concerned …
One tries to over power the other. It has been the same debate since ages, a theist society overshadows the atheist by trying to test their beliefs by asking questions of fate, destiny, and naturalness; while the later try to counter-question the prior by giving examples of natural calamities occurring and where there is no god to control them. In this issue it is difficult to reach to a conclusion that is acceptable to all.

I have been a believer since birth may be because I was brought up in a spiritual family which believes in the vastness and sanctity of God as the supreme power. I have passed through a phase where I started questioning the existence of God and my own self for that matter.
What I understood of them is that Human craves for peace, harmony and by believing, it provides me with happiness, protection, confidence, faith and all the more harmony and peace. An atheist might get all this by not believing in God and hence contended.

Hi POV, have you been introduced to http://www.reasons.org ?

http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/design_evidences/200608_fine_tuning_for_life_in_the_universe.shtml

East and West

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItKpIvje5LQ&feature=related

God spoke, His Word was like a “Big Bang” = the sonic boom = Let there be, and there it was!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y5ORpMTebI

Any Questions?