On the eve of [tag]Maha Shivratri[/tag] a great victory was won. Devotees, backed by the state and other institutions, ensured that the right to pray the way you want to, in the language that you understand, in the manner that you choose , was upheld.
In the face of a growing demand for their dismissal as the priests of Lord Nataraj temple in Chidambaram, who assaulted non-Brahmin devotees for wanting to sing [tag]Tamil hymns[/tag] inside the temple, the [tag]Brahmin priests[/tag] ~ Dikshits ~ today agreed to allow worship in Tamil.
The Dikshits, who control the administration of the temple, relented after political parties, Leftist and Tamil nationalist groups threatened to agitate and make demands for a government takeover of the temple administration.
The Dikshits, who assaulted some devotees led by non-Brahmin priest Arumugasamy Odhuvar heading a Saivaite Mutt when they had come to sing Tamil hymns composed by revered saints of Hindu renaissance on Sunday, seemed much mellow today and welcomed volunteers of a few Leftist organisations who entered the temple for the same purpose.
And, this is 2008. Devotees still face the kind of threat that [tag]Tulsidas[/tag] faced when he rewrote the [tag]Ramayan[/tag] in Brij Bhasa and Jyaneshwar translated the [tag]Bhagwad Gita[/tag] into Marathi … thereby making them accessible to all. People of all types arent' allowed to enter places of worship. some prevent women. others prevent 'other' castes – whatever they maybe. Which is why last night's reading was so much more poignant.
This is Dr.[tag]Ambedkar[/tag] on the role of social status in our society.
That economic power is the only kind of power no student of human society can accept. That the social status of an individual by itself often becomes a source of power and authority is made clear by the sway which the Mahatmos have held over the common man. Why do millionaires in India obey penniless Sadhus and Fakirs ? Why do millions of paupers in India sell their trifling trinkets which constitute their only wealth and go to Benares and Mecca ? That, religion is the source of power is illustrated by the history of India where the priest holds a sway over the common man often greater than the magistrate and where everything, even such things as strikes and elections, so easily take a religious turn and can so easily be given a religious twist.
Take the case of the Plebians of Rome as a further illustration of the power of religion over man. It throws great light on this point. The Plebs had fought for a share in the supreme executive under the Roman Republic and had secured the appointment of a Plebian Consul elected by a separate electorate constituted by the Commitia Centuriata, which was an assembly of Piebians. They wanted a Consul of their own because they felt that the Patrician Consuls used to discriminate against the Plebians in carrying on the administration. They had apparently obtained a great gain because under the Republican Constitution of Rome one Consul had the power of vetoing an act of the other Consul.
But did they in fact gain anything ? The answer to this question must be in the negative. The Plebians never could get a Plebian Consul who could be said to be a strong man and who could act independently of the Patrician Consul. In the ordinary course of things the Plebians should have got a strong Plebian Consul in view of the fact that his election was to be by a separate electorate of Plebians. The question is why did they fail in getting a strong Plebian to officiate as their Consul?
The answer to this question reveals the dominion which religion exercises over the minds of men. It was an accepted creed of the whole Roman populus that no official could enter upon the duties of his office unless the Oracle of Delphi declared that he was acceptable to the Goddess. The priests who were in charge of the temple of the Goddess of Delphi were all Patricians. Whenever therefore the Plebians elected a Consul who was known to be a strong party man opposed to the Patricians or " communal " to use the term that is current in India, the Oracle invariably declared that he was not acceptable to the Goddess. This is how the Plebians were cheated out of their rights.
But what is worthy of note is that the Plebians permitted themselves to be thus cheated because they too like the Patricians, held firmly the belief that the approval of the Goddess was a condition precedent to the taking charge by an official of his duties and that election by the people was not enough. If the Plebians had contended that election was enough and that the approval by the Goddess was not necessary they would have derived the fullest benefit from the political right which they had obtained. But they did not. They agreed to elect another, less suitable to themselves but more suitable to the Goddess which in fact meant more amenable to the Patricians. Rather than give up religion, the Plebians give up material gain for which they had fought so hard. Does this not show that religion can be a source of power as great as money if not greater ?
The fallacy of the Socialists lies in supposing that because in the present stage of European Society property as a source of power is predominant, that the same is true of India or that the same was true of Europe in the past. Religion, social status and property are all sources of power and authority, which one man has, to control the liberty of another. One is predominant at one stage; the other is predominant at another stage. That is the only difference. If liberty is the ideal, if liberty means the destruction of the dominion which one man holds over another then obviously it cannot be insisted upon that economic reform must be the one kind of reform worthy of pursuit. If the source of power and dominion is at any given time or in any given society social and religious then social reform and religious reform must be accepted as the necessary sort of reform.
When the religious right in circa 2008 stands up and says 'this reform is against our religious traditions, ' what they are doing is following an age old tradition of dogma. They have opposed every major social reform movement – whether it was ending caste discrimination, or rights for women, or rights for various types of minorities not sanctioned by their dogma (religious, sexual, left handers, race … what ever) . It is no different now, than it was 80 years ago… except that it is citizens pushing for our rights … where are the leaders ?
“Annihilation of caste” will no doubt send you soul-searching. I wonder, if you will still claim the instance you have written about as pushing “our” rights, when you are done with it. Such concessions, to me, appears more of losing grounds than gaining any rights. It pains to see people pushing for such ambivalent rights.
Hi Prabin…
Yes i would. I have read the book before.. when i was much younger and found it to be relevant…
I think that Dr.Ambedkar was a Repbulican to the core — someone who believed in all our Fundamental Rights … including the right to worship…
I have my issues with organised religion in general… and have serious issues with the way ‘Hindu’ power systems dealt with sections who were non upper caste male….
But, if someone wants to go and worship in a temple in their manner in which they wish… that is their right – fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution…. my own misgivings on religion, opiates, and subjugation don’t come into the picture…
it may not be a right I want for myself (for example the right to wear the sacred thread or the right to perform the last rights), the right to learn the vedas) – all traditionally barred for women… but if someone fights for that right under the constitution … more power to them..
The social barriers in India — the programmed barriers of do’s and don’ts go beyond rejecting God and religion. Maybe it is the appropriation / reclaiming of the symbols of power .. that is the key !
Hello Harini,
I knew you had read it before (from earlier discussion), I meant that “temple entry” didnt get any good mention in the book, be for a reason probably.
I agree that, I should respect people’s wishes and their rights to worship.., even if I think its not a right to be somewhere on some debilitating terms.
There are examples aplenty in India that show, call for change comes when people face crude and outright discrimination. All temple priests maintain Women are impure- i know about the ones in Puri/Orissa and recently heard Kanchi Sankarachaya in a film, but controversy rages only on Sabarimala issue. Kayastas fought tooth and nail to gain temple entry- calcutta high court ruled they couldn’t. Once they got it, they settled for their status in religious order. I might be wrong about this specific case, but all sections of society seem to have satisfied in playing second fiddle.
Forget about the “others” when will these people, those who have active interaction with the religious right and those who have achieved considerable success both in education and socio/economic status, will “reclaim” equality for themselves, or the symbols of power-learning Vedas, being priests, if thats the key ?
Or have they realised that, social barriers could be fought despite religion/god, that they do not represent the symbols of power anymore ?
I agree with you…
there are two different issues here
a) caste discrimination — both the subtle and the overt manifestations need to be anihilated…. I am not sure that it will happen unless caste itself goes… until we hold on to caste based traditions and caste based surnames, or caste based show of pride… the discrimination remains… simply because the origins are discriminatory……
But, we (as a nation) hold on to them in the name of social tradition or whatever….And until we hold on these, the caste system will thrive.
b) the right to equality – i have equal rights under the eyes of the state, and the state will ensure that all institutions – including religion – will respect those rights….
The way to achieve this is a lot more public action… use the State and the Judiciary to uphold the constitution…. most of us just give up……
When Tamilian dalit christians are given the rear pews in Churches (the upper caste christians are in the front pews) .. sue them…. When the Sabrimala doesn’t allow women in, take them to court….
the Hindu tradition has a great tendency to co opt all other streams and Gods as its own…. go to Shirdi and you will see that a Sufi Saint has been Brahminzed (seriously). Look at Buddha and his take over by the dashavatar mythology !
….And, in the co-option it re affirms various sorts of status – be it gender or caste or whatever —
Civic Society has to keep prodding the state to ensure that constitutional rights are upheld…. to give a parallel, equal opportunity is not a self running system in the West… activists of all hues and shades move the courts periodically to ensure that those rights are not violated..
I guess we are much in agreement about enforcing our rights in society. I went back to find out what was Dr. Ambedkar’s stand on temple entry. He started Kalaram temple entry movement in 1930, and in 1933 he opposed the Temple entry bill, eventually stopping the movement a year later.
I have posted some of his explanations in this blog as quotations. They are long posts, if possible check ’em out.
http://ambedkarquotes.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/temple-entry-wont-make-equals/
http://ambedkarquotes.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/do-depressed-classes-desire-temple-enty/
rights have to be continously fought for and maintained….
whether it is the right to free expression or the right to live your life as you see fit, or a right to live without discrimination.. the right to be without others f***ing our trip 🙂
In a constitutional republic … it is our fundamental right…. and I am afraid that we are all handing back these rights to fundamentalists and fanatics.
You are right when you say that temple entry won’t make equals … but it isn’t one thing that makes up inequality… it is a lot of bricks and this is just one of them… it has to be dismantled in every sphere … this is just a start…